On Monday, 4 September 2006 11:08, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry, i am only slowly catching up after vacation.
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 01:09:34PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Change suspend_console() so that it waits for all consoles to flush the
> > remaining messages and make it possible to switch the console suspending
> > off with the help of a Kconfig option.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw at sisk.pl>
>
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_DISABLE_CONSOLE_SUSPEND
> > /**
> > * suspend_console - suspend the console subsystem
> > *
> > @@ -709,8 +710,14 @@ int __init add_preferred_console(char *n
> > */
> > void suspend_console(void)
> > {
> > + printk("Suspending console(s)\n");
> > acquire_console_sem();
> > console_suspended = 1;
> > + /* This is needed so that all of the messages that have already been
> > + * written to all consoles can be actually transmitted (eg. over a
> > + * network) before we try to suspend the consoles' devices.
> > + */
> > + ssleep(2);
>
> Sorry, but no. Suspend and resume is already slow enough, no need to make
> both of them much slower.
> If we can condition this on the netconsole being used, ok, but not for the
> most common case of "console is on plain VGA".
Hm, it already is in -mm, but of course I can prepare a patch that removes
this ssleep().
Pavel, what do you think?
Rafael
--
You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
R. Buckminster Fuller
