Hi! Okay, I never liked opPoint framework... so your critism seems okay, but do your patches really solve all the points you raised? On Sun 2006-08-27 13:54:31, Eugeny S. Mints wrote: > 2006/8/26, David Singleton <daviado at gmail.com>: > > On 8/19/06, Dave Jones <davej at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 08:20:45PM -0700, David Singleton wrote: ... > > 1) I believe I now have the right kernel interface for a common > > power management infrastructure. > - md_data has an issue from OO design paradigm perspective. OpPoint > requires an entity above PowerOP to know internals of arch md_data (see > centrino-dynamic-powerop.c implementation) and thus requires an arch Is that what you were trying to solve with string parsing? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
