On Sun 2006-08-27 14:34:06, Eugeny S. Mints wrote: > 2006/8/26, Pavel Machek <pavel at ucw.cz>: > >> >I do not think this can work in notebook world, sorry. > >> >You'll just get > >> >way too many operating points. > >> The only feature for notebook world currently presented > >> in the kernel is CPUFreq. CPUFreq PowerOP integration > > > >Actually no. In the notebook world, we do cpufreq, selective powerdown > >of devices (/sys/**/power/state), and suspend-to-ram/disk (not sure if > >it applies to you, but at least some powerop versions wanted to > >replace that). > integration with legacy PM kernel code is the next step for PowerOP. > There is no chance to address all in one step. We need to go step by > step. Ok, but I guess I can't review it unless you do all the steps, and it seems to me you are going into the wrong direction now. > >> </personal> Pavel, > >> please stop removing original recipients from either TO: > >> or CC: lists! > >> please, when you snip original message _do_not_ snip > >> names of replied persons! > >> </end> > > > >Do you have example where I did that? > This thread is example of both: original letter in this thread has 3 > recepients while in your first reply there is noone. > And there is no a name of reply originator between your 'Hi' and > '>>>>' signes while for example I have '2006/8/26, Pavel Machek > <pavel at ucw.cz>' in this reply. Ok, so you care about attribution lines. I'll try to keep them. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
