[linux-pm] PowerOp Design and working patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Vitaly Wool wrote:
> Within the given use case for a particular board, given the
> possibility of runtime OP creation, there shouldn't be any need to
> specify ALL the OPs.
...
> Again, IMO you should specify what OPs are valid to be able to
> validate runtime-created OPs, but you shouldn't limit OP creation
> kernel-wise.

OK, I agree completely. Please ignore my last message.
I didn't understand your previous comment in the
context of runtime-created OPs.

Sorry,
  -- Tim

=============================
Tim Bird
Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum
Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Electronics
=============================



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux