On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:18:55PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday 06 July 2006 23:07, David Brownell wrote: > > On Thursday 06 July 2006 2:01 pm, Dave Jones wrote: > > > > > Why not just use __memcpy instead? Which should be safe on all archs > > > to do the simplest possible memcpy. > > > > Or __constant_memcpy(...PAGE_SIZE) ? :) > > Is __memcpy() defined on all architectures? Eg. ppc? Seems not. __constant_memcpy is a gcc built-in though isn't it ? Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
