On Thursday 06 July 2006 2:01 pm, Dave Jones wrote: > Why not just use __memcpy instead? Which should be safe on all archs > to do the simplest possible memcpy. Or __constant_memcpy(...PAGE_SIZE) ? :) Good idea. - Dave
On Thursday 06 July 2006 2:01 pm, Dave Jones wrote: > Why not just use __memcpy instead? Which should be safe on all archs > to do the simplest possible memcpy. Or __constant_memcpy(...PAGE_SIZE) ? :) Good idea. - Dave