On Sunday 14 May 2006 17:39, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Ne 14-05-06 16:32:24, Richard Hughes wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 20:01 +0000, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > > First, sorry for the random mail to this mailing list. > > > > > > > > I'm the developer of gnome-power-manager. The latest mini-project of > > > > mine is to fix the suspend-hibernate nomenclature used by OSS projects. > > > > > > > > This might not effect the lowest layers of the stack (i.e. I want to > > > > focus on the stuff used by *users*), so this might not be applicable to > > > > you guys. Please keep me cc'd if you discuss, as I'm not subscribed to > > > > this list. > > > > > > > > Full description of the problem is here: > > > > http://live.gnome.org/GnomePowerManager/SleepNames and I would encourage > > > > you guys to add comments to the end of the wiki if required. > > > > > > Please do not use word 'thaw'. We already freeze processes during > > > suspend, and we thaw them during resume. > > > > Got any better ideas? It needs to *just* apply to hibernation, not a > > generic term like wake. > > reanimate? As you said, users are unlikely to see this one. > > Alternatives: > > dehibarnate (unhibernate?), resume-from-disk :-), ressurect, > resuscitate (particulary useful if s-2-disk is buggy :-), revive, ... Maybe "wake up"? :-) Rafael
