Hi! > > I have divided the changes into some more or less logical steps for clarity. > > Although the code has been designed as proof-of-concept, it is functional > > and has been tested on x86-64, except for the cryptographic functionality > > and error paths. > > Don't worry about crypto paths too much. It is my fault, I should not > have taken them in the first place. Just ask ast for testing when you > are reasonably confident it will work. We exchanged few emails with ast, and he'll probably not kill me if I remove crypto swsusp support. That's good news ;-). Pavel -- Thanks, Sharp!
