Hi! > I have divided the changes into some more or less logical steps for clarity. > Although the code has been designed as proof-of-concept, it is functional > and has been tested on x86-64, except for the cryptographic functionality > and error paths. Don't worry about crypto paths too much. It is my fault, I should not have taken them in the first place. Just ask ast for testing when you are reasonably confident it will work. Pavel -- Thanks, Sharp!
