Hi! > > Here's prototype code for swsusp3. It seems to work for me, but don't > > try it... yet. Code is very ugly at places, sorry, I know and will fix > > it. This is just proof that it can be done, and that it can be done > > without excessive ammount of code. > > No comments on the code sorry. Instead I want to ask, could you please > find a different name? swsusp3 is going to make people think that it's > Suspend2 redesigned. Since there hasn't been a swsusp2 (so far as I > know), how about using that name instead? At least then we'll clearly > differentiate the two implementations and you won't confuse/irritate > users. swsusp2 can't be used, it is already "taken" by suspend2 (25000 hits on google). I was actually hoping that you would release suspend4 (using swsusp3 infrastructure) :-). I guess I could call it "uswsusp". Pavel -- if you have sharp zaurus hardware you don't need... you know my address
