Hi Pavel. On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 08:32, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > Here's prototype code for swsusp3. It seems to work for me, but don't > try it... yet. Code is very ugly at places, sorry, I know and will fix > it. This is just proof that it can be done, and that it can be done > without excessive ammount of code. No comments on the code sorry. Instead I want to ask, could you please find a different name? swsusp3 is going to make people think that it's Suspend2 redesigned. Since there hasn't been a swsusp2 (so far as I know), how about using that name instead? At least then we'll clearly differentiate the two implementations and you won't confuse/irritate users. Regards, Nigel
