Hi. On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 14:48, Li Shaohua wrote: > Hi, > On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 17:53, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > > Sorry for raising the problem again after a long time. I got some > > > reports about ' xxx not stopped' at suspend time. The general cause > > is > > > one task is waiting for another task which has been into > > refrigerator > > > first. Report an error and stop suspend can't solve the problem. > > After > > > the task's dependent task is released from refrigerator, the task > > itself > > > will soon go into refrigerator and will never be waked up. > > > Nigel's refrigerator patch half solves the problem. It distinct > > kernel > > > tasks and user tasks, so can solve the dependence between kernel > > tasks > > > and user tasks, but can't solve the user tasks dependence. Right, > > Nigel? > > > > That's right, but the example you give below is userspace (syslogd) vs > > kernel space (kjournald), so I wonder if something could be wrong with > > your implementation. > Right, my example can be solved with your patch. But I'd like a more > generic solution to solve all the dependences, like user space tasks > dependencies. Do you have a particular example in mind? I haven't seen or heard of any freezing failures in Suspend2 for ages, so I'm struggling to see what is lacking. Regards, Nigel -- Nigel Cunningham Software Engineer, Canberra, Australia http://www.cyclades.com Bus: +61 (2) 6291 9554; Hme: +61 (2) 6292 8028; Mob: +61 (417) 100 574 Maintainer of Suspend2 Kernel Patches http://suspend2.net
