Hi! > > Just for clarity's sake, what are you thinking should happen to MTRR > > support? > > Become more componentized. We need a better way to represent optional > features of any device, but in particular CPUs. We should never be calling > it directly; we should be looping over the feature drivers bound to a 'CPU > Driver' and suspending them. Actually, no. mtrr's are cpu local. That means they need to be handled by CPU hotplug framework. I guess we should just drop them from "normal" device trees, and create something per-CPU. Perhaps plain old notification list is enough for this one. Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
