[linux-pm] Nested suspends; messages vs. states

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Nigel Cunningham wrote:

> Just for clarity's sake, what are you thinking should happen to MTRR
> support?

Become more componentized. We need a better way to represent optional
features of any device, but in particular CPUs. We should never be calling
it directly; we should be looping over the feature drivers bound to a 'CPU
Driver' and suspending them.


	Pat

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux