[linux-pm] Some thoughts on suspend/resume development

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 14:23:27 -0500 (EST), Alan Stern
<stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> 
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=109944258827464&w=2
> 
> A very interesting and relevant thread; thank you for pointing it out.
> The conclusion was that as of last November, Greg was trying to put
> together a solution.  Has there been any progress?
>
> A more concrete question is: Should mutual exclusion between probe/remove
> and suspend/resume be handled by the bus rwsem, by a semaphore in struct
> device, or by individual bus drivers?  Offhand I don't see any reason why
> the rwsem wouldn't be enough.
> 

I think the most flexible way would be having a per-device semaphore
(managed by driver core). This way operations WRT one device are
serialized but you not getting into deadlocks if you need to add or
drop some devices.

-- 
Dmitry

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux