On Sat, 4 Dec 2004, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > After all, if the wakeup/resume event had occurred just _prior_ to the > > > start of the sleep transition, it would effectively have been lost anyway. > > > > How so? If it were _prior_ then there'd have been no reason > > not to respond immediately; nothing lost. > > You have fully runing system and get wakeup event, what do you do? > Ignore it => if you are currently suspending, and get wakeup event, > just ignore it. If it had come second earlier you'd ignore it, too... That's not a good way of describing it, since a fully running system won't get any wakeup or resume events. However... If you have a running system with a selectively suspended device, and the device sends a resume request and consequently is resumed, and then a second later the entire system goes to sleep -- the net effect is the same as if the resume request had never been received. Alan Stern
