Hi! > > > I suspect the short answer is that there will be cases where > > > the sleep transition needs to be aborted, but we can probably > > > expect the typical case will be that the hardware resume > > > signaling is effectively "level sensitive", not edge-triggered. > > > > As Pavel pointed out, it doesn't matter too much if the request gets lost. > > I don't think I noticed that message, or entirely agree. > > > > After all, if the wakeup/resume event had occurred just _prior_ to the > > start of the sleep transition, it would effectively have been lost anyway. > > How so? If it were _prior_ then there'd have been no reason > not to respond immediately; nothing lost. You have fully runing system and get wakeup event, what do you do? Ignore it => if you are currently suspending, and get wakeup event, just ignore it. If it had come second earlier you'd ignore it, too... Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
