Hi! > [Moved to linux-pm mailing list] > > On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, David Brownell wrote: > > > I've got to catch up on those linux-pm discussions (I was doing > > some PM work instead of discussing it :) ... but last time I > > checked in, I didn't like the way "frozen" was getting addressed. > > > > It was looking more and more like a swsusp-specific state that's > > just a workaround for not having selective resume for the device > > on which the swsusp snapshot would be written out... (to David:) Except that FREEZE is also neccessary for kexec, would be needed even with selective resume, and is probably good idea for powerdown/reboot too? [Oh and btw stop whining about selective resume -- it is not going to happen anytime soon. It is probably not going to happen, period. It is bad idea and I do not want it near my code.] Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
