On Wednesday 03 November 2004 16:22, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 01:22 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > [Hmm, and in_suspend() is probably better name, consistent with
> > in_atomic() and in_interrupt().]
>
> Yah.
I posted a sketch of how to do subtree suspends a while back,
which had the nice side consequence that this would work:
static inline int in_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
return !list_empty(&dev->power.entry);
}
Actually, we should need only one function for in_suspend()
and in_resume().
I hope that nobody's assuming devices only suspend as part of
system sleep state transitions ... one device tree might be
suspending while another (or its parent!) is fully active...
- Dave
