Hi! > > Actually, request_firmware_nowait does not help. Userland would see > > non-functional hardware after resume but before > > request_firmware_nowait() is done. That would hurt for example with > > nfsroot and firmware over nfs, or just general confusion "why is this > > f***ing network card broken". > > Hrm... suspending with NFS root seems to be quite an acrobatic exercice > anyway, but I see your point. Still, a synchronous request_firmware is > broken anyway, while the nowait version may work. > > > Solution seems to be "do request_firmware before suspend begins, and > > cache it in memory". > > Which requires knowing when it is safe to rely on userland, which means > having ways to be notified before the whole suspend/resume process > starts as we already discussed. I'm still wondering if that could be > done via separate PM_* messages (PM_PRE_SUSPEND, PM_POST_RESUME) or > via a simple notifier... PM_PRE_SUSPEND sounds good. (That would be event = ON, flags = PM_PRE_SUSPEND, right? :-) Is there any real use for PM_POST_RESUME? Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!