[linux-pm] PM models

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: [linux-pm] PM models
From: david-b at pacbell.net (David Brownell)
Date: Fri Dec 10 13:26:48 2004
In-reply-to: <1099359346.29690.393.camel@gaston>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0411011047340.1421-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200411011606.18180.david-b@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1099359346.29690.393.camel@gaston>

On Monday 01 November 2004 17:35, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> 
> What we need for APM is freeze.

OK, then so far as I'm concerned there's no longer
any question about _needing_ "freeze".

Should that just be a new suspend_state_t value?

- Dave

Follow-Ups:
- [linux-pm] PM models
  - From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt

References:
- [linux-pm] PM models
  - From: Alan Stern
- [linux-pm] PM models
  - From: David Brownell
- [linux-pm] PM models
  - From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Prev by Date: [linux-pm] add typechecking to driver model
Next by Date: [linux-pm] PM models
Previous by thread: [linux-pm] PM models
Next by thread: [linux-pm] PM models
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ACPI] [Netdev] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless] [CPU Freq] [Kernel Newbies] [Fedora Kernel] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba]

Powered by Linux