On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 20:50 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > On Friday 29 October 2004 10:26, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > > > > > Just read the paper David did summarizing our discussions, I think it's > > > pretty clear the kind of callbacks we need. > > > > David, can you post that paper/summary, please? > > Here's the current version. Subject to change etc. > > Updates since the last version include addresssing comments > from Pavel, Benjamin, and me; especially trying to articulate > the distinctions between "System PM" (sleep states) and > "Device PM". (I'm not sure what Benjamin means by "Dynamic PM", > but suspect it has to do with "Device PM".) Plus some updates > based on email over the last couple days. Yes, what I call Dynamic PM is basically driver local PM policy, that is a driver locally deciding to put it's hw in a low power state due to overall idleness, but with automatic wakeup upon arrival of an upstream request. Ben.
