[linux-pm] Re: Concerns about our pci_{save,restore}_state()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: [linux-pm] Re: Concerns about our pci_{save,restore}_state()
From: arjan at infradead.org (Arjan van de Ven)
Date: Fri Dec 10 13:26:43 2004
In-reply-to: <1098685464.26695.32.camel@gaston>
References: <1098677182.26697.21.camel@gaston> <417C991C.2070806@xxxxxxxxx> <1098685464.26695.32.camel@gaston>

On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 16:24 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> Currently, the default does nothing (doesn't even save/restore).

Are you sure? I could have sworn I made the default action to
save/restore some time ago

--

Follow-Ups:
- [linux-pm] Re: Concerns about our pci_{save,restore}_state()
  - From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt

References:
- [linux-pm] Concerns about our pci_{save,restore}_state()
  - From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
- [linux-pm] Re: Concerns about our pci_{save,restore}_state()
  - From: Jeff Garzik
- [linux-pm] Re: Concerns about our pci_{save,restore}_state()
  - From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Prev by Date: [linux-pm] Re: Add typechecking to suspend types and powerdown types
Next by Date: [linux-pm] Re: Concerns about our pci_{save,restore}_state()
Previous by thread: [linux-pm] Re: Concerns about our pci_{save,restore}_state()
Next by thread: [linux-pm] Re: Concerns about our pci_{save,restore}_state()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ACPI] [Netdev] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless] [CPU Freq] [Kernel Newbies] [Fedora Kernel] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba]

Powered by Linux