Megha, On Wed, Sep 30 2020 at 10:25, Megha Dey wrote: > On 9/30/2020 8:20 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >>>> Your IMS patches? Why do you need something special again? > > By IMS patches, I meant your IMS driver patch that was updated (as it > was untested, it had some compile errors and we removed the IMS_QUEUE > parts) : Ok. > The whole patchset can be found here: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/f4a085f1-f6de-2539-12fe-c7308d243a4a@xxxxxxxxx/ > > It would be great if you could review the IMS patches :) It somehow slipped through the cracks. I'll have a look. > We were hoping to get IMS in the 5.10 merge window :) Hope dies last, right? >>> We might be able to put together a mockup just to prove it >> If that makes Megha's stuff going that would of course be appreciated, >> but we can defer the IMS_QUEUE part for later. It's orthogonal to the >> IMS_ARRAY stuff. > > In our patch series, we have removed the IMS_QUEUE stuff and retained > only the IMS_ARRAY parts > as that was sufficient for us. That works. We can add that back when Jason has his puzzle pieces sorted. Thanks, tglx
