Hi again,
Just trying to bump and also asking a question ...
That 1 us, could that be related to L0s latency - so should we add a
potential workaround by doing
max_t(u32, 1000, L0s.up + L0s.dw) to ensure that the time is never
greater on any hardware ;)
And also warn about it... =)
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 4:58 PM Ian Kumlien <ian.kumlien@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Changes:
> * Handle L0s correclty as well, making it per direction
> * Moved the switch cost in to the if statement since a non L1 switch has
> no additional cost.
>
> For L0s:
> We sumarize the entire latency per direction to see if it's acceptable
> for the PCIe endpoint.
>
> If it's not, we clear the link for the path that had too large latency.
>
> For L1:
> Currently we check the maximum latency of upstream and downstream
> per link, not the maximum for the path
>
> This would work if all links have the same latency, but:
> endpoint -> c -> b -> a -> root (in the order we walk the path)
>
> If c or b has the higest latency, it will not register
>
> Fix this by maintaining the maximum latency value for the path
>
> This change fixes a regression introduced (but not caused) by:
> 66ff14e59e8a (PCI/ASPM: Allow ASPM on links to PCIe-to-PCI/PCI-X Bridges)
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Kumlien <ian.kumlien@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> index b17e5ffd31b1..bc512e217258 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> @@ -434,7 +434,8 @@ static void pcie_get_aspm_reg(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>
> static void pcie_aspm_check_latency(struct pci_dev *endpoint)
> {
> - u32 latency, l1_switch_latency = 0;
> + u32 latency, l1_max_latency = 0, l1_switch_latency = 0,
> + l0s_latency_up = 0, l0s_latency_dw = 0;
> struct aspm_latency *acceptable;
> struct pcie_link_state *link;
>
> @@ -447,15 +448,22 @@ static void pcie_aspm_check_latency(struct pci_dev *endpoint)
> acceptable = &link->acceptable[PCI_FUNC(endpoint->devfn)];
>
> while (link) {
> - /* Check upstream direction L0s latency */
> - if ((link->aspm_capable & ASPM_STATE_L0S_UP) &&
> - (link->latency_up.l0s > acceptable->l0s))
> - link->aspm_capable &= ~ASPM_STATE_L0S_UP;
> -
> - /* Check downstream direction L0s latency */
> - if ((link->aspm_capable & ASPM_STATE_L0S_DW) &&
> - (link->latency_dw.l0s > acceptable->l0s))
> - link->aspm_capable &= ~ASPM_STATE_L0S_DW;
> + if (link->aspm_capable & ASPM_STATE_L0S) {
> + /* Check upstream direction L0s latency */
> + if (link->aspm_capable & ASPM_STATE_L0S_UP) {
> + l0s_latency_up += link->latency_up.l0s;
> + if (l0s_latency_up > acceptable->l0s)
> + link->aspm_capable &= ~ASPM_STATE_L0S_UP;
> + }
> +
> + /* Check downstream direction L0s latency */
> + if (link->aspm_capable & ASPM_STATE_L0S_DW) {
> + l0s_latency_dw += link->latency_dw.l0s;
> + if (l0s_latency_dw > acceptable->l0s)
> + link->aspm_capable &= ~ASPM_STATE_L0S_DW;
> + }
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Check L1 latency.
> * Every switch on the path to root complex need 1
> @@ -469,11 +477,14 @@ static void pcie_aspm_check_latency(struct pci_dev *endpoint)
> * L1 exit latencies advertised by a device include L1
> * substate latencies (and hence do not do any check).
> */
> - latency = max_t(u32, link->latency_up.l1, link->latency_dw.l1);
> - if ((link->aspm_capable & ASPM_STATE_L1) &&
> - (latency + l1_switch_latency > acceptable->l1))
> - link->aspm_capable &= ~ASPM_STATE_L1;
> - l1_switch_latency += 1000;
> + if (link->aspm_capable & ASPM_STATE_L1) {
> + latency = max_t(u32, link->latency_up.l1, link->latency_dw.l1);
> + l1_max_latency = max_t(u32, latency, l1_max_latency);
> + if (l1_max_latency + l1_switch_latency > acceptable->l1)
> + link->aspm_capable &= ~ASPM_STATE_L1;
> +
> + l1_switch_latency += 1000;
> + }
>
> link = link->parent;
> }
> --
> 2.28.0
>
