Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] PCI: aardvark: Fix support for Turris MOX and Compex wifi cards

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 18 May 2020 14:46:14 +0100
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 12:30:04PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Sunday 17 May 2020 17:57:02 Gregory CLEMENT wrote:  
> > > Hello,
> > >   
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 10:06:13 +0200
> > > > Pali Rohár <pali@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >  
> > > >> Marek Behún (5):
> > > >>   PCI: aardvark: Improve link training
> > > >>   PCI: aardvark: Add PHY support
> > > >>   dt-bindings: PCI: aardvark: Describe new properties
> > > >>   arm64: dts: marvell: armada-37xx: Set pcie_reset_pin to gpio function
> > > >>   arm64: dts: marvell: armada-37xx: Move PCIe comphy handle property
> > > >> 
> > > >> Pali Rohár (7):
> > > >>   PCI: aardvark: Train link immediately after enabling training
> > > >>   PCI: aardvark: Don't blindly enable ASPM L0s and don't write to
> > > >>     read-only register
> > > >>   PCI: of: Zero max-link-speed value is invalid
> > > >>   PCI: aardvark: Issue PERST via GPIO
> > > >>   PCI: aardvark: Add FIXME comment for PCIE_CORE_CMD_STATUS_REG access
> > > >>   PCI: aardvark: Replace custom macros by standard linux/pci_regs.h
> > > >>     macros
> > > >>   arm64: dts: marvell: armada-37xx: Move PCIe max-link-speed property  
> > > >
> > > > Thanks a lot for this work. For a number of reasons, I'm less involved
> > > > in Marvell platform support in Linux, but I reviewed your series and
> > > > followed the discussions around it, and I'm happy to give my:
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxxxxx>  
> > > 
> > > With this acked-by for the series, the reviewed-by from Rob on the
> > > binding and the tested-by, I am pretty confident so I applied the
> > > patches 10, 11 and 12 on mvebu/dt64.
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > Gregory  
> > 
> > Thank you!
> > 
> > Lorenzo, would you now take remaining patches?  
> 
> Yes - even though I have reservations about patch (5) and the
> problem is related to a complete lack of programming model for
> these host controllers and a clear separation between what's
> done in the OS vs bootloader, PERST handling in this host
> bridge is *really* a mess.
> 
> I applied 1-9 to pci/aardvark.
> 
> Lorenzo

Hooray, thanks, Lorenzo (and everyone else).




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux