Hi Julia, everyone.
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 12:28:47PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can you forward this patch to the people below if you think it is
> appropriate?
Yes, this patch is appropriate. It was actually part of
git.kernel.org/linus/c5bf68fe0c86 . It should be safe, (and desirable as
it removes a chance for deadlock) to apply it.
Sebastian, Kurt, Logan, Bjorn, please consider picking it up.
> Could I tell the kbuild people to add you to the CC list for
> this semantic patch?
Yes, sure. Please feel free to add me to CC list for stream_open.cocci
related patches.
Kirill
> thanks,
> julia
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 18:23:18 +0800
> From: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: kbuild@xxxxxx
> Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH] pci/switchtec: fix stream_open.cocci warnings
>
> CC: kbuild-all@xxxxxx
> TO: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Kurt Schwemmer <kurt.schwemmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> CC: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> From: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> drivers/pci/switch/switchtec.c:395:1-17: ERROR: switchtec_fops: .read() can deadlock .write(); change nonseekable_open -> stream_open to fix.
>
> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/stream_open.cocci
>
> Fixes: a3a1e895d4fa ("pci/switchtec: Don't use completion's wait queue")
> Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git linux-5.0.y-rt-rebase
> head: 31cc76d5590f5e60c2f26f029e40bc7d0441d93f
> commit: a3a1e895d4fa0508e11ac9107ace883a5b2a4d3b [171/305] pci/switchtec: Don't use completion's wait queue
> :::::: branch date: 6 days ago
> :::::: commit date: 6 days ago
>
> Please take the patch only if it's a positive warning. Thanks!
>
> switchtec.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/pci/switch/switchtec.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/switch/switchtec.c
> @@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ static int switchtec_dev_open(struct ino
> return PTR_ERR(stuser);
>
> filp->private_data = stuser;
> - nonseekable_open(inode, filp);
> + stream_open(inode, filp);
>
> dev_dbg(&stdev->dev, "%s: %p\n", __func__, stuser);
>
