On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 03:20:45PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > +int acpi_device_power_add_dependent(struct acpi_device *adev,
> > + struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct acpi_power_resource_entry *entry;
> > + struct list_head *resources;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (!adev->power.flags.power_resources)
> > + return 0;
> > + if (!adev->power.states[ACPI_STATE_D0].flags.valid)
> > + return 0;
>
> The two checks above can be replaced with an
> adev->flags.power_manageable one AFAICS (the "valid" flag is always
> set for D0 and the list below will be empty if there are no power
> resources).
>
> Same for acpi_device_power_remove_dependent(), of course.
OK, I'll do that in next version.
> Apart from this LGTM.
Thanks!
