On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 6:19 PM Mika Westerberg
<mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> If there are shared power resources between otherwise unrelated devices
> turning them on causes the other devices sharing them to be powered up
> as well. In case of PCI devices go into D0uninitialized state meaning
> that if they were configured to trigger wake that configuration is lost
> at this point.
>
> For this reason introduce a concept of "_PR0 dependent device" that can
> be added to any ACPI device that has power resources. The dependent
> device will be included in a list of dependent devices for all power
> resources returned by the ACPI device's _PR0 (assuming it has one).
> Whenever a power resource having dependent devices is turned physically
> on (its _ON method is called) we runtime resume all of them to allow
> their driver or in case of PCI the PCI core to re-initialize the device
> and its wake configuration.
>
> This adds two functions that can be used to add and remove these
> dependent devices. Note the dependent device does not necessary need
> share power resources so this functionality can be used to add "software
> dependencies" as well if needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/power.c | 139 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 4 ++
> 2 files changed, 143 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/power.c b/drivers/acpi/power.c
> index a916417b9e70..76d298192940 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/power.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/power.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,11 @@ ACPI_MODULE_NAME("power");
> #define ACPI_POWER_RESOURCE_STATE_ON 0x01
> #define ACPI_POWER_RESOURCE_STATE_UNKNOWN 0xFF
>
> +struct acpi_power_dependent_device {
> + struct device *dev;
> + struct list_head node;
> +};
> +
> struct acpi_power_resource {
> struct acpi_device device;
> struct list_head list_node;
> @@ -51,6 +56,7 @@ struct acpi_power_resource {
> unsigned int ref_count;
> bool wakeup_enabled;
> struct mutex resource_lock;
> + struct list_head dependents;
> };
>
> struct acpi_power_resource_entry {
> @@ -232,8 +238,125 @@ static int acpi_power_get_list_state(struct list_head *list, int *state)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int
> +acpi_power_resource_add_dependent(struct acpi_power_resource *resource,
> + struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct acpi_power_dependent_device *dep;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&resource->resource_lock);
> + list_for_each_entry(dep, &resource->dependents, node) {
> + /* Only add it once */
> + if (dep->dev == dev)
> + goto unlock;
> + }
> +
> + dep = kzalloc(sizeof(*dep), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!dep) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto unlock;
> + }
> +
> + dep->dev = dev;
> + list_add_tail(&dep->node, &resource->dependents);
> + dev_dbg(dev, "added power dependency to [%s]\n", resource->name);
> +
> +unlock:
> + mutex_unlock(&resource->resource_lock);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +acpi_power_resource_remove_dependent(struct acpi_power_resource *resource,
> + struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct acpi_power_dependent_device *dep;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&resource->resource_lock);
> + list_for_each_entry(dep, &resource->dependents, node) {
> + if (dep->dev == dev) {
> + list_del(&dep->node);
> + kfree(dep);
> + dev_dbg(dev, "removed power dependency to [%s]\n",
> + resource->name);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&resource->resource_lock);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * acpi_device_power_add_dependent - Add dependent device of this ACPI device
> + * @adev: ACPI device pointer
> + * @dev: Dependent device
> + *
> + * If @adev has non-empty _PR0 the @dev is added as dependent device to all
> + * power resources returned by it. This means that whenever these power
> + * resources are turned _ON the dependent devices get runtime resumed. This
> + * is needed for devices such as PCI to allow its driver to re-initialize
> + * it after it went to D0uninitialized.
> + *
> + * If @adev does not have _PR0 this does nothing.
> + *
> + * Returns %0 in case of success and negative errno otherwise.
> + */
> +int acpi_device_power_add_dependent(struct acpi_device *adev,
> + struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct acpi_power_resource_entry *entry;
> + struct list_head *resources;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!adev->power.flags.power_resources)
> + return 0;
> + if (!adev->power.states[ACPI_STATE_D0].flags.valid)
> + return 0;
The two checks above can be replaced with an
adev->flags.power_manageable one AFAICS (the "valid" flag is always
set for D0 and the list below will be empty if there are no power
resources).
Same for acpi_device_power_remove_dependent(), of course.
Apart from this LGTM.
