Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Potential fix for runpm issues on various laptops

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



ping to the pci folks? I really would like to know what you make out of it.

In fact, this kind of looks like a pcie issue, but I just don't know
enough to really be able to tell. I am mainly wondering why putting
the device with a 2.5 vs a 8.0 link into d3cold makes the resume path
break? Any ideas? broken pcie controller? broken implementation on the
gpu?

On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 10:12 PM Karol Herbst <kherbst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> CCing linux-pci and Bjorn Helgaas. Maybe we could get better insights on
> how a reasonable fix would look like.
>
> Anyway, to me this entire issue looks like something which has to be fixed
> on a PCI level instead of inside a driver, so it makes sense to ask the
> pci folks if they have any better suggestions.
>
> Original cover letter:
> While investigating the runpm issues on my GP107 I noticed that something
> inside devinit makes runpm break. If Nouveau loads up to the point right
> before doing devinit, runpm works without any issues, if devinit is ran,
> not anymore.
>
> Out of curiousity I even tried to "bisect" devinit by not running it on
> vbios provided signed PMU image, but on the devinit parser we have inside
> Nouveau.
> Allthough this one isn't as feature complete as the vbios one, I was able
> to reproduce the runpm issues as well. From that point I was able to only
> run a certain amount of commands until I got to some PCIe initialization
> code inside devinit which trigger those runpm issues.
>
> Devinit on my GPU was changing the PCIe link from 8.0 to 2.5, reversing
> that on the fini path makes runpm work again.
>
> There are a few other things going on, but with my limited knowledge about
> PCIe in general, the change in the link speed sounded like it could cause
> issues on resume if the controller and the device disagree on the actual
> link.
>
> Maybe this is just a bug within the PCI subsystem inside linux instead and
> the controller has to be forced to do _something_?
>
> Anyway, with this runpm seems to work nicely on my machine. Secure booting
> the gr (even with my workaround applied I need anyway) might fail after
> the GPU got runtime resumed though...
>
> Karol Herbst (4):
>   drm: don't set the pci power state if the pci subsystem handles the
>     ACPI bits
>   pci: enable pcie link changes for pascal
>   pci: add nvkm_pcie_get_speed
>   pci: save the boot pcie link speed and restore it on fini
>
>  drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/subdev/pci.h |  6 +++--
>  drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c            |  7 +++++-
>  drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.h            |  2 ++
>  drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c             | 14 +++++++++---
>  drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h             |  2 ++
>  drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pci/base.c    |  9 ++++++--
>  drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pci/gk104.c   |  8 +++----
>  drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pci/gp100.c   | 10 +++++++++
>  drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pci/pcie.c    | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pci/priv.h    |  7 ++++++
>  10 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.21.0
>



[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux