Hi, On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 06:27:31PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 07:38:56PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > Gigabyte X299 DESIGNARE EX motherboard has one PCIe root port that is > > connected to an Alpine Ridge Thunderbolt controller. This port has slot > > implemented bit set in the config space but other than that it is not > > hotplug capable in the sense we are expecting in Linux (it has > > dev->is_hotplug_bridge set to 0): > > > > 00:1c.4 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 200 Series PCH PCI Express Root Port #5 > > Bus: primary=00, secondary=05, subordinate=46, sec-latency=0 > > Memory behind bridge: 78000000-8fffffff [size=384M] > > Prefetchable memory behind bridge: 00003800f8000000-00003800ffffffff [size=128M] > > ... > > Capabilities: [40] Express (v2) Root Port (Slot+), MSI 00 > > ... > > SltCap: AttnBtn- PwrCtrl- MRL- AttnInd- PwrInd- HotPlug- Surprise- > > Slot #8, PowerLimit 25.000W; Interlock- NoCompl+ > > SltCtl: Enable: AttnBtn- PwrFlt- MRL- PresDet- CmdCplt- HPIrq- LinkChg- > > Control: AttnInd Unknown, PwrInd Unknown, Power- Interlock- > > SltSta: Status: AttnBtn- PowerFlt- MRL- CmdCplt- PresDet- Interlock- > > Changed: MRL- PresDet+ LinkState+ > > > > This system is using ACPI based hotplug to notify the OS that it needs > > to rescan the PCI bus (ACPI hotplug). > > > > If there is nothing connected in any of the Thunderbolt ports the root > > port will not have any runtime PM active children and is thus > > automatically runtime suspended pretty soon after boot by PCI PM core. > > Now, when a device is connected the BIOS SMI handler responsible for > > enumerating newly added devices is not able to find anything because the > > port is in D3. > > > > Prevent this from happening by blacklisting PCI power management of this > > particular Gigabyte system. > > Since this is one of those issues we seem to have to discover > experimentally, I'd like to include a URL here to a kernel.org > bugzilla that has a dmesg log, "lspci -vvvnn" output, an acpidump, and > anything else that might be useful to extend or generalize this in the > future. Maybe dmidecode output, too? > > If somebody creates the bugzilla, I can add the URL; no need to repost > just for that. Here it is: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202031
