Hi,
On Thu, 2018-12-06 at 09:09 +0800, Jianjun Wang wrote:
> MT7629 is an arm platform SoC which has the same PCIe IP with MT7622.
>
> The read value of BAR0 is 0xffff_ffff, it's size will be calculated as 4GB
> in arm64 but bogus alignment values at arm32, the pcie device and devices
> behind this bridge will not be enabled. Fix it's BAR0 resource size to
> guarantee the pcie devices will be enabled correctly.
>
> The HW default value of its device id is invalid, fix it's device id to
> match the hardware implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/pci_ids.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c
> index d20cf461ba00..f8937cc3c87c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c
> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
> #define PCIE_MSI_VECTOR 0x0c0
>
> #define PCIE_CONF_VEND_ID 0x100
> +#define PCIE_CONF_DEVICE_ID 0x102
> #define PCIE_CONF_CLASS_ID 0x106
>
> #define PCIE_INT_MASK 0x420
> @@ -135,12 +136,14 @@ struct mtk_pcie_port;
> /**
> * struct mtk_pcie_soc - differentiate between host generations
> * @need_fix_class_id: whether this host's class ID needed to be fixed or not
> + * @need_fix_device_id: whether this host's device ID needed to be fixed or not
> * @ops: pointer to configuration access functions
> * @startup: pointer to controller setting functions
> * @setup_irq: pointer to initialize IRQ functions
> */
> struct mtk_pcie_soc {
> bool need_fix_class_id;
> + bool need_fix_device_id;
> struct pci_ops *ops;
> int (*startup)(struct mtk_pcie_port *port);
> int (*setup_irq)(struct mtk_pcie_port *port, struct device_node *node);
> @@ -692,6 +695,11 @@ static int mtk_pcie_startup_port_v2(struct mtk_pcie_port *port)
> writew(val, port->base + PCIE_CONF_CLASS_ID);
> }
>
> + if (soc->need_fix_device_id) {
> + val = PCI_DEVICE_ID_MEDIATEK_7629;
<just_checking>
Could we have a generic way to fix it? It's better not to add SoC
specific settings in shared function.
</just_checking>
> + writew(val, port->base + PCIE_CONF_DEVICE_ID);
> + }
> +
> /* 100ms timeout value should be enough for Gen1/2 training */
> err = readl_poll_timeout(port->base + PCIE_LINK_STATUS_V2, val,
> !!(val & PCIE_PORT_LINKUP_V2), 20,
> @@ -1238,11 +1246,29 @@ static const struct mtk_pcie_soc mtk_pcie_soc_mt7622 = {
> .setup_irq = mtk_pcie_setup_irq,
> };
>
> +static const struct mtk_pcie_soc mtk_pcie_soc_mt7629 = {
> + .need_fix_class_id = true,
> + .need_fix_device_id = true,
> + .ops = &mtk_pcie_ops_v2,
> + .startup = mtk_pcie_startup_port_v2,
> + .setup_irq = mtk_pcie_setup_irq,
> +};
> +
> +static void mtk_fixup_bar_size(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> + struct resource *dev_res = &dev->resource[0];
> + /* 32bit resource length will calculate size to 0, set it smaller */
> + dev_res->end = 0xfffffffe;
> +}
> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_MEDIATEK, PCI_DEVICE_ID_MEDIATEK_7629,
> + mtk_fixup_bar_size);
> +
> static const struct of_device_id mtk_pcie_ids[] = {
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-pcie", .data = &mtk_pcie_soc_v1 },
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt7623-pcie", .data = &mtk_pcie_soc_v1 },
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2712-pcie", .data = &mtk_pcie_soc_mt2712 },
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt7622-pcie", .data = &mtk_pcie_soc_mt7622 },
> + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt7629-pcie", .data = &mtk_pcie_soc_mt7629 },
> {},
> };
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci_ids.h b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
> index 69f0abe1ba1a..77b278bac3a8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci_ids.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
> @@ -2126,6 +2126,7 @@
> #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_MYRICOM 0x14c1
>
> #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_MEDIATEK 0x14c3
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_MEDIATEK_7629 0x7629
>
> #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_TITAN 0x14D2
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_TITAN_010L 0x8001
