On 2018-12-12 5:25 p.m., Jon Mason wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 7:01 PM Logan Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 2018-12-12 4:57 p.m., Jon Mason wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 6:42 PM Logan Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 2018-12-12 4:00 p.m., Jon Mason wrote: >>>>> So, you based your patches on a series of patches not in the >>>>> ntb/ntb-next branch? Please don't do this. I see nothing in these >>>>> patches which requires that series, which makes this even more >>>>> unnecessary. Since these are fairly trivial, I'm taking them and >>>>> pushing to the ntb-next branch to give these more time to be tested >>>>> (due to not being tested on the proper branch). I would really >>>>> appreciate you testing the ntb-next branch as a sanity check. >>>> >>>> The NTB test tools don't work with switchtec hardware without that patch >>>> set, so there's no way to test the changes without that branch. >>> >>> Then let's get those patches in. IIRC, I asked you to split up the >>> patch series to be bugfixes and features (or at least reorder the >>> series so I can split it up that way in my branches). Also, I think >>> Serge had some comments that may/may not need to be addressed. Could >>> you please reorder and resend (and Serge can comment as needed on the >>> resend)? >> >> I resent a while back and responded to all the feedback. Every patch in >> that series fixes a bug. None of them add features. > > Per https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/12/552, I asked the series be split > up and the comments to be cleaned-up. You repushed without addressing > this (or Serge's comments), which caused me to ignore the series. > Again, I'm happy to take it as a single series and split it up on my > end, I just need the patches reordered to have the bugfixes I > specified in the front to allow for this to be easily done. And what was not clear about my response? https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/12/577 That commit is absolutely *not* a feature request. Without it, none of the other fixes will fix anything and are thus worse than useless. I responded to Serge's comments and then responded *again* in the cover letter of v2. What he was asking for was, and still is, physically impossible. Logan