On Fri, 2018-09-21 at 22:34 +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> writes:
>
> > That seems to be the correct type.
> Okay, but what happens here when adev_id->driver_data is a value out
> of enum
> range ? Does the following assignment make sense ?
> > + type = (enum pxa_ssp_type)adev_id->driver_data;
>
> As a side note, could you join for the next throw to the review :
> - Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> - Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Argh, of course I forgot. My apologies.
Jarkko & Mika, I'm wondering if you could take a look at the [1] thread
and tell me what you think. (I can forward it to you via e-mail too, if
you're not subscribed to lists it has been Cc'd to, if that would be
more convenient).
[1] [PATCH 0/11] spi: pxa2xx: add DT and slave mode support"
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181010170936.316862-1-lkundrak@xxxxx/T/#t
Thanks
Lubo
>
> Even if they are Intel, I think they have worked a lot on this driver
> for Intel
> platforms.
>
> Cheers.
>
