Re: Need information w.r.t PCIe end point framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Kishon,
Could you please help me with the below questions?

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 12:43 AM vidya sagar <sagar.tv@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I have following queries w.r.t PCIe endpoint framework in kernel in
> the context of a DesignWare core IP.
> -> Since the PCIe spec says that the endpoint should have stable
> REFCLK before it observes PEX_RST from host, endpoint's LTSSM in a way
> depends on arrival of PEX_RST from host (there by locking endpoint's
> internal PLLs to incoming REFCLK from host, followed by core
> programming and finally enabling LTSSM of endpoint). But, IIUC, the
> endpoint framework starts LTSSM based on writing '1' to 'start' in epc
> device's config-fs entry. What is the rationale behind it? Why is
> starting LTSSM in endpoint decoupled from PEX_RST toggle?
> -> Also, kernel documentation says that the sequence is first creating
> EPF device followed by EPC device and linking it with already created
> EPF device and finally going for link up. This implicitly assumes
> that, programming of core registers is happening in the absence of
> REFCLK from host. Does it mean, there are internal clock sources
> available for DWC core programming (dbi registers programming) before
> REFCLK is available from host, and, finally when PEX_RST is observed,
> switch clock source from internal clock source to external REFCLK?
>
> Thanks,
> Vidya Sagar



[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux