On Thu, 2018-08-16 at 07:52 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-08-15 at 13:50 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > Yes, this is definitely broken. Some folks have tried to fix it in
> > the past, but it hasn't quite happened yet. We actually merged one
> > patch, 40f11adc7cd9 ("PCI: Avoid race while enabling upstream
> > bridges"), but had to revert it after we found issues:
> >
> > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1501858648-22228-1-git-send-email-srinath.mannam@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170915072352.10453.31977.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Ok so I had a look at this previous patch and it adds yet anothe use of
> some global mutex to protect part of the operation which makes me
> cringe a bit, we have too many of these.
>
> What do you think of the one I sent yesterday ? (I can't find it in the
> archives yet)
I verified on my Thinkpad X1 Carbon Gen4, everything seems to be
working fine with the patch applied, including iwlwifi.
> [RFC PATCH] pci: Proof of concept at fixing pci_enable_device/bridge races
>
> The patch itself needs splitting etc... but the basic idea is to move away
> from those global mutexes in a number of places and have one in the pci_dev
> struct itself to protect its state.
>
> I would also like to use this rather than the bitmap atomics for is_added
> etc... (Hari's fix) in the long run. Atomics aren't significantly cheaper
> and imho makes thing even messier.
>
> Jens, Konstantin, any chance you can test if the above also breaks iwlwifi
> (I don't see why it would but ...)
>
> Cheers,
> Ben.
>
