On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 03:55:00PM +0530, Subrahmanya Lingappa wrote:
> Hi Lorenzo,
>
> Our reference IP's hardware registers require the to support 256GB
> inbound window size and this driver did exactly that I believe.
No it does not, please check what this patch does, the window size
is not currently configured as you wish.
More importantly, nobody can even test it given that this driver lacks a
Kconfig and a Makefile entry unless I am missing something, I presume
they were lost in patch reviews but you ought to fix this as soon as
possible please since this was something I should not have missed.
> May I ask, why do you think this size is questionable ?
The macro is not questionable, it is buggy, the size is what you
tell me it should be, I agree.
Lorenzo
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 4:56 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
> <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 12:45:39PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >> IB_WIN_SIZE is larger than INT_MAX so we need to cast it to u64.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 9af6bcb11e12 ("PCI: mobiveil: Add Mobiveil PCIe Host Bridge IP driver")
> >> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> Untested... Possibly the problem is that there are too many multiplies
> >> by * 1024.
> >
> > Hi Subrahmanya,
> >
> > I always thought that that macro value was questionable, please
> > can you comment on this ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Lorenzo
> >
> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mobiveil.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mobiveil.c
> >> index 4d6c20e47bed..cf0aa7cee5b0 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mobiveil.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mobiveil.c
> >> @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
> >> #define CFG_WINDOW_TYPE 0
> >> #define IO_WINDOW_TYPE 1
> >> #define MEM_WINDOW_TYPE 2
> >> -#define IB_WIN_SIZE (256 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024)
> >> +#define IB_WIN_SIZE ((u64)256 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024)
> >> #define MAX_PIO_WINDOWS 8
> >>
> >> /* Parameters for the waiting for link up routine */
