Re: [PATCH v16 5/9] PCI/AER: Factor out error reporting from AER

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2018-05-11 18:28, Lukas Wunner wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 06:43:24AM -0400, Oza Pawandeep wrote:
+void pcie_do_fatal_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev)
+{
+	struct pci_dev *udev;
+	struct pci_bus *parent;
+	struct pci_dev *pdev, *temp;
+	pci_ers_result_t result = PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED;
+	struct aer_broadcast_data result_data;
+
+	if (dev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE)
+		udev = dev;
+	else
+		udev = dev->bus->self;
+
+	parent = udev->subordinate;
+	pci_lock_rescan_remove();
+	list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(pdev, temp, &parent->devices,
+				 bus_list) {
+		pci_dev_get(pdev);
+		pci_dev_set_disconnected(pdev, NULL);
+		if (pci_has_subordinate(pdev))
+			pci_walk_bus(pdev->subordinate,
+				     pci_dev_set_disconnected, NULL);
+		pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(pdev);
+		pci_dev_put(pdev);
+	}

Any reason not to simply call

	pci_walk_bus(udev->subordinate, pci_dev_set_disconnected, NULL);

before the list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse() iteration, instead of
calling it for each device on the subordinate bus and for each
device's children?  Should be semantically identical, saves 3 LoC
and saves wasted cycles of acquiring pci_bus_sem over and over again
for each device on the subordinate bus.

Thanks,

Lukas

Well this is borrowed code from DPC driver, hence I thought to keep the same. but to me it looks like its taking care of PCIe switch where is goes through all the subordinates, and which could turn out to be more swicthes down the line, and son on...
it goes all the way down to the tree
Am I missing something here ?









[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux