On Wednesday, April 4, 2018 11:10:41 PM CEST Feng Kan wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:41:33AM -0700, Feng Kan wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 10:29 AM, Feng Kan <fkan@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > When bridge and its endpoint is enumerated the devices are added to the > >> > dpm list. Afterward, the bridge defers probe when IOMMU is not ready. > >> > This causes the bridge to be moved to the end of the dpm list when > >> > deferred probe kicks in. The order of the dpm list for bridge and > >> > endpoint is reversed. > >> > > >> > Add reordering code to move the bridge and its children and consumers to > >> > the end of the pm list so the order for suspend and resume is not altered. > >> > The code also move device and its children and consumers to the tail of > >> > device_kset list if it is registered. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Feng Kan <fkan@xxxxxxx> > >> > Signed-off-by: Toan Le <toanle@xxxxxxx> > >> > ... > >> > > >> Hi, just wanted to check if there is anything else I need to change on > >> this. Thanks. > > > > I'm assuming Rafael will handle this. > Rafael, sorry to ping again. Do you have a position on this patch yet? Sorry, I thought that Greg might want to send a comment here. I'm basically fine with the approach. I only have two minor remarks to the kernedoc comment of the new function, but let me reply directly to the patch message.
