Hi,
On Tuesday 03 April 2018 04:13 PM, Gustavo Pimentel wrote:
> Hi Kishon,
>
> On 02/04/2018 06:35, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday 28 March 2018 05:08 PM, Gustavo Pimentel wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Please add a commit message.
>
> Ok. I'll add. Thanks for noticing it.
>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt | 13 +++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt
>>> index 6300762..4bb2e08 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt
>>> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>>> Required properties:
>>> - compatible:
>>> "snps,dw-pcie" for RC mode;
>>> + "snps,dw-pcie-ep" for EP mode;
>>> - reg: Should contain the configuration address space.
>>> - reg-names: Must be "config" for the PCIe configuration space.
>>> (The old way of getting the configuration address space from "ranges"
>>> @@ -56,3 +57,15 @@ Example configuration:
>>> #interrupt-cells = <1>;
>>> num-lanes = <1>;
>>> };
>>> +or
>>> + pcie_ep: pcie_ep@dfc00000 {
>>> + compatible = "snps,dw-pcie-ep";
>>> + reg = <0xdfc00000 0x0001000>, /* IP registers 1 */
>>> + <0xdfc01000 0x0001000>, /* IP registers 2 */
>>
>> Doesn't this have iATU unroll space?
>
> I don't think EP has it, but I'm no expert on this matter. Can you provide me
> some example of having iATU unroll space mapping would be useful in EP scope?
I'm not sure. I thought if the dwc3 core version is 4.80, then it'll have a
separate ATU space irrespective of RC mode or EP mode.
Thanks
Kishon
