Dear Bjorn, Lorenzo
On 2018/3/21 1:46, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 10:43:22AM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote:
In preparation for introducing End-Point driver for Rockchip
PCIe controller, we create a new folder to follow the convention
of dwc and cadence. Then we rename the host driver from pcie-rockchip.c
to pcie-rockchip-host.c, and only leave some common functions in
pcie-rockchip.c in order to be reused for both of host and EP drivers.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
...
diff --git a/drivers/pci/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/Kconfig
index 34b56a8..b85ad40 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pci/Kconfig
@@ -141,4 +141,5 @@ source "drivers/pci/cadence/Kconfig"
source "drivers/pci/dwc/Kconfig"
source "drivers/pci/host/Kconfig"
source "drivers/pci/endpoint/Kconfig"
+source "drivers/pci/rockchip/Kconfig"
source "drivers/pci/switch/Kconfig"
Why is this out of order? This seems exactly analogous to
drivers/pci/cadence and dwc, so they should be next to each other.
This confused me as well! I just put "rockchip" before "switch"
to keep the order, but I didn't know why "endpoint" wasn't ordered.
diff --git a/drivers/pci/Makefile b/drivers/pci/Makefile
index 9419709..8434afb 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/pci/Makefile
@@ -55,6 +55,8 @@ obj-y += switch/
obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_ENDPOINT) += endpoint/
+obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_ROCKCHIP) += rockchip/
+
# Endpoint library must be initialized before its users
obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_CADENCE) += cadence/
# pcie-hisi.o quirks are needed even without CONFIG_PCIE_DW
Similarly here.
I admit to still being a little dubious about the idea of a bunch of
vendor-specific directories, each containing a completely trivial
Makefile, a mostly-trivial Kconfig, a header file, a shared .c file, a
host .c file, and an endpoint .c file.
So do I.
One alternative would be to keep the single pcie-rockchip.c file with
an #ifdef CONFIG_PCIE_ROCKCHIP_HOST section and an #ifdef
CONFIG_PCIE_ROCKCHIP_EP section.
I admit I thought this eariler, however, I don't like it personally, as
it confuses the new-comer to follow the convention here, if we are
alternatives just for "style issue" or "personal taste".
Certainly, I could do that beased on your suggestion, but I would like
to know if this's the final agreement both you and Lorenzo reached. :)
Bjorn
