On Wed, 2018-02-28 at 17:08 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > What's the bottom line? Do we want this for sparc? If so, do you > want to take it, Dave M, or would you like me to? I need to fix it first, and then the intention is for Dave to take it. There'll be a final patch to remove ARCH_GENERIC_PCI_MMAP_RESOURCE once it's actually ubiquitous, but I need to do all the "fun" architectures through their own trees first. I deliberately gave you only the trivial ones, in the first batch. For precisely this reason — because I might have missed details.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
