Re: [PATCH v10] PCI: tango: Add MSI controller support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 25/08/2017 17:25, Robin Murphy wrote:

> On 25/08/17 16:01, Mason wrote:
>
>> Robin wrote a prophetic post back in March:
>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-March/492965.html
>>
>>> The appropriate DT property would be "dma-ranges", i.e.
>>>
>>> pci@... {
>>> 	...
>>> 	dma-ranges = <(PCI bus address) (CPU phys address) (size)>;
>>> }
>>
>> The dma-ranges property seems to be exactly what I'm looking for:
>>
>> Restrict DMA to the first X MB of RAM (use a bounce buffer
>> for other physical addresses).
>>
>> I added the following property to my PCIe node
>>
>>   dma-ranges = <0x0 0x80000000 0x80000000 0x20000000>;
>>
>> with the intent to create a 1:1 mapping for [0x80000000, 0xa0000000[
>>
>> But it does not work. Arg!
>>
>> My PCIe controller driver seems to be correctly calling of_dma_get_range:
>>
>> [    0.520469] [<c03d85e8>] (of_dma_get_range) from [<c03d5ad8>] (of_dma_configure+0x48/0x234)
>> [    0.520483] [<c03d5ad8>] (of_dma_configure) from [<c02fa154>] (pci_device_add+0xac/0x350)
>> [    0.520493] [<c02fa154>] (pci_device_add) from [<c02fa488>] (pci_scan_single_device+0x90/0xb0)
>> [    0.520501] [<c02fa488>] (pci_scan_single_device) from [<c02fa500>] (pci_scan_slot+0x58/0x100)
>> [    0.520510] [<c02fa500>] (pci_scan_slot) from [<c02fb418>] (pci_scan_child_bus+0x20/0xf8)
>> [    0.520519] [<c02fb418>] (pci_scan_child_bus) from [<c02fb6e8>] (pci_scan_root_bus_msi+0xcc/0xd8)
>> [    0.520527] [<c02fb6e8>] (pci_scan_root_bus_msi) from [<c02fb70c>] (pci_scan_root_bus+0x18/0x20)
>> [    0.520537] [<c02fb70c>] (pci_scan_root_bus) from [<c0310544>] (pci_host_common_probe+0xc8/0x314)
>> [    0.520546] [<c0310544>] (pci_host_common_probe) from [<c0310ce8>] (tango_pcie_probe+0x148/0x350)
>> [    0.520557] [<c0310ce8>] (tango_pcie_probe) from [<c034d398>] (platform_drv_probe+0x34/0x6c)
>>
>> of_dma_get_range() is called on the pcie node (which is expected)
>> but after parsing n_addr_cells and n_size_cells in the while loop,
>> the code jumps to the parent node ("soc")... while my property is
>> attached to the pcie node...
> 
> This is not your driver calling of_dma_get_range(), this is the PCI core
> doing so in the act of DMA master configuration for a discovered
> *endpoint*. The fact that the "pass the host controller's OF node
> because we don't have one for the endpoint" bodge only works properly
> for dma-coherent and not dma-ranges is a known, but irrelevant, problem.
> 
> If your host controller driver needs to discover its windows from DT to
> configure *itself*, it needs to parse dma-ranges itself; see pcie-iproc,
> pcie-racar, pcie-xgene, etc. for examples.

Yes, I'm aware that I need to do my own parsing of dma-ranges.
I can use that information to configure BAR0.base and the
region registers.

But Linux needs to record my settings at some point, right?
Otherwise, how does the DMA framework know that devices can
only reach cpu addresses [0x80000000, 0xa0000000[ and when
to use bounce buffers?

What's preventing the XHCI driver from allocating memory
outside of my "safe" range, and having the DMA framework
blindly map that?

Regards.



[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux