> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Reshetova, Elena > <elena.reshetova@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > >> On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 15:38:29 -0600 > >> Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> > [+cc Hyper-V folks, -cc others] > >> > > >> > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:21:04PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote: > >> > > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be > >> > > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as > >> > > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental > >> > > refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free > >> > > situations. > >> > > > >> > > Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > > Signed-off-by: Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > > Signed-off-by: David Windsor <dwindsor@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Getting back on this: could you take the patch via your tree or should I resubmit > to some dedicated place with a new review-by added? > > Sorry, for some reason I had assumed this would all go as part of the > larger series. I applied it to my pci/host-hv branch with Stephen's > reviewed-by for v4.12. Thank you very much! I think I confused everyone in the beginning, but later on we decided that it is better off in small chunks and separate tress. Best Regards, Elena. > > Thanks for the ping! > > Bjorn
