On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Reshetova, Elena <elena.reshetova@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 15:38:29 -0600 >> Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > [+cc Hyper-V folks, -cc others] >> > >> > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:21:04PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote: >> > > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be >> > > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as >> > > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental >> > > refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free >> > > situations. >> > > >> > > Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@xxxxxxxxx> >> > > Signed-off-by: Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@xxxxxxxxx> >> > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > > Signed-off-by: David Windsor <dwindsor@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> >> Reviewed-by: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Getting back on this: could you take the patch via your tree or should I resubmit to some dedicated place with a new review-by added? Sorry, for some reason I had assumed this would all go as part of the larger series. I applied it to my pci/host-hv branch with Stephen's reviewed-by for v4.12. Thanks for the ping! Bjorn
