Hi Frank, On 06/04/17 07:24, Frank Rowand wrote: > On 04/04/17 03:18, Sricharan R wrote: >> From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Invalid dma-ranges values should be worked around when retrieving the >> DMA range in of_dma_get_range(), not by all callers of the function. >> This isn't much of a problem now that we have a single caller, but that >> situation will change when moving DMA configuration to device probe >> time. > > Please drop this patch from the series. I just now sent Rob an > alternative that reflects other changes that have occurred since > this patch series was first created many, many moons ago > (https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/4/6/53). Fine by me too - if we can get rid of that dubious fixup altogether, all the better. Feel free to transfer my Reviewed-by to your patch if you like. Thanks, Robin. > Thanks, > > Frank > >> >> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/of/address.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-- >> drivers/of/device.c | 15 --------------- >> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/of/address.c b/drivers/of/address.c >> index 02b2903..6aeb816 100644 >> --- a/drivers/of/address.c >> +++ b/drivers/of/address.c >> @@ -819,8 +819,8 @@ void __iomem *of_io_request_and_map(struct device_node *np, int index, >> * CPU addr (phys_addr_t) : pna cells >> * size : nsize cells >> * >> - * It returns -ENODEV if "dma-ranges" property was not found >> - * for this device in DT. >> + * Return 0 on success, -ENODEV if the "dma-ranges" property was not found for >> + * this device in DT, or -EINVAL if the CPU address or size is invalid. >> */ >> int of_dma_get_range(struct device_node *np, u64 *dma_addr, u64 *paddr, u64 *size) >> { >> @@ -880,6 +880,22 @@ int of_dma_get_range(struct device_node *np, u64 *dma_addr, u64 *paddr, u64 *siz >> *dma_addr = dmaaddr; >> >> *size = of_read_number(ranges + naddr + pna, nsize); >> + /* >> + * DT nodes sometimes incorrectly set the size as a mask. Work around >> + * those incorrect DT by computing the size as mask + 1. >> + */ >> + if (*size & 1) { >> + pr_warn("%s: size 0x%llx for dma-range in node(%s) set as mask\n", >> + __func__, *size, np->full_name); >> + *size = *size + 1; >> + } >> + >> + if (!*size) { >> + pr_err("%s: invalid size zero for dma-range in node(%s)\n", >> + __func__, np->full_name); >> + ret = -EINVAL; >> + goto out; >> + } >> >> pr_debug("dma_addr(%llx) cpu_addr(%llx) size(%llx)\n", >> *dma_addr, *paddr, *size); >> diff --git a/drivers/of/device.c b/drivers/of/device.c >> index b1e6beb..09dedd0 100644 >> --- a/drivers/of/device.c >> +++ b/drivers/of/device.c >> @@ -110,21 +110,6 @@ void of_dma_configure(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np) >> size = dev->coherent_dma_mask + 1; >> } else { >> offset = PFN_DOWN(paddr - dma_addr); >> - >> - /* >> - * Add a work around to treat the size as mask + 1 in case >> - * it is defined in DT as a mask. >> - */ >> - if (size & 1) { >> - dev_warn(dev, "Invalid size 0x%llx for dma-range\n", >> - size); >> - size = size + 1; >> - } >> - >> - if (!size) { >> - dev_err(dev, "Adjusted size 0x%llx invalid\n", size); >> - return; >> - } >> dev_dbg(dev, "dma_pfn_offset(%#08lx)\n", offset); >> } >> >>
