On 31/01/17 11:57 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > Sorry, it was probably me :) Nope, it was Christoph Hellwig. I don't mind changing it. It's just hard to know what's expected all the time. > Why do you need this? Wherever you put it, it should be built as part > of the online kernel documentation. Who is the audience for this > documentation? Well usually documenting how to use the device is a good thing. Is it not? The audience would be people wanting to make use of the userspace interface. Though in fairness, the vast majority of people should use our library. I also thought it would be useful to reviewers to more quickly understand the interface we are creating. If maintainers want us to leave it out, we can, but that seems like an odd request. > Do future stuff in the future, no need for that now, right? > > Simple is best. Ok, I can push it all into the C file for v2. > I'll leave that up to the PCI maintainer, but just a single .c file in a > subdir seems odd to me. Thanks, Logan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
