On 31/01/17 10:26 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > That's one big patch to review, would you want to do that? Sorry, will do. > Can you break it up into smaller parts? At least put the documentation > separately, right? Ha, funny. Last time I sent a patch someone asked for the documentation to be in the same patch. But I can easily split this up. > And don't dump a .txt file into Documentation/ anymore, people are > working to move to the newer format. Fair. I wasn't sure where a good place to put it was. Any suggestions? > Also, please rebase against Linus's tree at the least, we can't go back > in time and apply this to the 4.9 kernel tree. Will do. > Why a .h file for a single .c file? I wanted to keep the hardware defining structs and macros in a separate file for future expansion. This hardware is also capable of some NTB functions which may find it's way into the kernel in the future. > Also, why a whole new directory? We didn't feel it fit in the pci director which was for standard pci stuff. We're more than open to other suggestions as to where this code belongs. Thanks, Logan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
