On 1/18/2017 5:53 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > I want to improve PCI bug tracking. It feels like our bugs don't get > the attention they need, and I'm soliciting ideas for how to improve > this. > > Current situation: > > - People often report bugs via email to linux-pci. I think this > is good because everybody can see it. > > - Even after an email report, I often request a bugzilla because > (1) it helps keep things from being forgotten, (2) it's a > convenient place to store bulky data, and (3) I like to have a > bugzilla URL to include in the changelog of a patch that fixes the > bug. > > - Sometimes people open a bugzilla directly. I get email about > these (along with one or two other people), but this is sort of a > problem because linux-pci never sees it, sometimes I miss it, and > things tend to languish. > > - Discussion on a bugzilla is only seen by people listed in the > bugzilla, not on linux-pci. > > I'm contemplating changing this so the bugzilla mail would also go to > linux-pci. I have seen this happening on linux-scsi. http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg103272.html I'd say, why not? > > Any objections or alternate suggestions? > > Bjorn > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
