[+cc Jingoo]
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 05:14:56PM +0800, Dongdong Liu wrote:
> This patch modifies the current Hip05/Hip06 PCIe host
> controller driver to add support for 'almost ECAM'
> compliant platforms. Some controllers are ECAM compliant
> for all the devices of the hierarchy except the root
> complex; this patch adds support for such controllers.
>
> This is needed in preparation for the ACPI based driver
> to allow both DT and ACPI drivers to use the same BIOS
> (that configure the Designware iATUs).
> This commit doesn't break backward compatibility with
> previous non-ECAM platforms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/pci/hisilicon-pcie.txt | 15 +++++---
> drivers/pci/host/Kconfig | 4 +-
> drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c | 4 +-
> drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h | 2 +
> drivers/pci/host/pcie-hisi.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/hisilicon-pcie.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/hisilicon-pcie.txt
> index 59c2f47..87a597a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/hisilicon-pcie.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/hisilicon-pcie.txt
> @@ -9,10 +9,13 @@ Additional properties are described here:
>
> Required properties
> - compatible: Should contain "hisilicon,hip05-pcie" or "hisilicon,hip06-pcie".
> -- reg: Should contain rc_dbi, config registers location and length.
> -- reg-names: Must include the following entries:
> +- reg: Should contain rc_dbi and either config or ecam-cfg registers
> + location and length (it depends on the platform BIOS).
> +- reg-names: Must include
> "rc_dbi": controller configuration registers;
> - "config": PCIe configuration space registers.
> + and one of the following entries:
> + "config": PCIe configuration space registers for non-ECAM platforms.
> + "ecam-cfg": PCIe configuration space registers for ECAM platforms
> - msi-parent: Should be its_pcie which is an ITS receiving MSI interrupts.
> - port-id: Should be 0, 1, 2 or 3.
>
> @@ -23,8 +26,10 @@ Optional properties:
> Hip05 Example (note that Hip06 is the same except compatible):
> pcie@0xb0080000 {
> compatible = "hisilicon,hip05-pcie", "snps,dw-pcie";
> - reg = <0 0xb0080000 0 0x10000>, <0x220 0x00000000 0 0x2000>;
> - reg-names = "rc_dbi", "config";
> + reg = <0 0xb0080000 0 0x10000>,
> + <0x220 0x00000000 0 0x2000>
> + /* or <0x220 0x00100000 0 0x0f00000> for ecam-cfg*/;
Add space before closing "*/".
> + reg-names = "rc_dbi", "config" /* or "ecam-cfg" */;
> bus-range = <0 15>;
> msi-parent = <&its_pcie>;
> #address-cells = <3>;
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig
> index d7e7c0a..ae98644 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig
> @@ -219,13 +219,13 @@ config PCIE_ALTERA_MSI
>
> config PCI_HISI
> depends on OF && ARM64
> - bool "HiSilicon Hip05 and Hip06 SoCs PCIe controllers"
> + bool "HiSilicon Hip05 and Hip06 and Hip07 SoCs PCIe controllers"
> depends on PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
> select PCIEPORTBUS
> select PCIE_DW
> help
> Say Y here if you want PCIe controller support on HiSilicon
> - Hip05 and Hip06 SoCs
> + Hip05 and Hip06 and Hip07 SoCs
>
> config PCIE_QCOM
> bool "Qualcomm PCIe controller"
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> index 035f50c..da11644 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> @@ -101,8 +101,6 @@
> #define PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R1_LINK_UP (0x1 << 4)
> #define PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R1_LINK_IN_TRAINING (0x1 << 29)
>
> -static struct pci_ops dw_pcie_ops;
> -
> int dw_pcie_cfg_read(void __iomem *addr, int size, u32 *val)
> {
> if ((uintptr_t)addr & (size - 1)) {
> @@ -800,7 +798,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_wr_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn,
> return dw_pcie_wr_other_conf(pp, bus, devfn, where, size, val);
> }
>
> -static struct pci_ops dw_pcie_ops = {
> +struct pci_ops dw_pcie_ops = {
> .read = dw_pcie_rd_conf,
> .write = dw_pcie_wr_conf,
> };
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
> index a567ea2..30d228a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
> @@ -83,4 +83,6 @@ struct pcie_host_ops {
> void dw_pcie_setup_rc(struct pcie_port *pp);
> int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp);
>
> +extern struct pci_ops dw_pcie_ops;
> +
> #endif /* _PCIE_DESIGNWARE_H */
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-hisi.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-hisi.c
> index 56154c2..555c964 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-hisi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-hisi.c
> @@ -43,6 +43,34 @@ struct hisi_pcie {
> struct pcie_soc_ops *soc_ops;
> };
>
> +static inline int hisi_rd_ecam_conf(struct pcie_port *pp, struct pci_bus *bus,
> + unsigned int devfn, int where, int size,
> + u32 *value)
> +{
> + return pci_generic_config_read(bus, devfn, where, size, value);
> +}
> +
> +static inline int hisi_wr_ecam_conf(struct pcie_port *pp, struct pci_bus *bus,
> + unsigned int devfn, int where, int size,
> + u32 value)
> +{
> + return pci_generic_config_write(bus, devfn, where, size, value);
> +}
> +
> +static void __iomem *hisi_pci_map_cfg_bus_cam(struct pci_bus *bus,
> + unsigned int devfn,
> + int where)
> +{
> + void __iomem *addr;
> + struct pcie_port *pp = bus->sysdata;
> +
> + addr = pp->va_cfg1_base - (pp->busn->start << 20) +
> + ((bus->number << 20) | (devfn << 12)) +
> + where;
> +
> + return addr;
> +}
> +
> /* HipXX PCIe host only supports 32-bit config access */
> static int hisi_pcie_cfg_read(struct pcie_port *pp, int where, int size,
> u32 *val)
> @@ -190,6 +218,23 @@ static int hisi_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return PTR_ERR(pp->dbi_base);
> }
>
> + reg = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "ecam-cfg");
> + if (reg) {
> + /* ECAM driver version */
> + hisi_pcie->pp.va_cfg0_base =
> + devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, reg);
> + if (IS_ERR(hisi_pcie->pp.va_cfg0_base)) {
> + dev_err(pp->dev, "cannot get ecam-cfg\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(hisi_pcie->pp.va_cfg0_base);
> + }
> + hisi_pcie->pp.va_cfg1_base = hisi_pcie->pp.va_cfg0_base;
> +
> + dw_pcie_ops.map_bus = hisi_pci_map_cfg_bus_cam;
I don't really like this part. We're scribbling on dw_pcie_ops, which this
driver does not own. That breaks the encapsulation and means that using
two different DW-based drivers in the same system (admittedly unlikely)
would fail mysteriously.
I wonder if this could be solved by allowing the DW-based drivers to supply
their own pci_ops. If we did that, it might let us get rid of the
rd_own_conf, wr_own_conf, rd_other_conf, and wr_other_conf function
pointers. I haven't worked through it, but it's possible the result would
be easier to read.
It's also possible it would be a lot of code churn for no real gain, and
breaking the encapsulation makes the most sense. What do you think?
> +
> + hisi_pcie_host_ops.rd_other_conf = hisi_rd_ecam_conf;
> + hisi_pcie_host_ops.wr_other_conf = hisi_wr_ecam_conf;
> + }
> +
> ret = hisi_add_pcie_port(hisi_pcie, pdev);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
